Wired: Engineering God in a Petri Dish
Keats’ real interest is to explore whether faith and reason can peaceably coexist. “There’s a schism between science and religion, a sense that you have to pick sides, and it threatens to turn us all into fundamentalists of one sort or another,” he said. “Science rejects God for want of empirical evidence, and religion rejects the scientific method the moment it contradicts the Bible.
“I’m trying to explore whether faith and reason can peaceably coexist. I think they can. So this project is truly a thought experiment: By taking the assumptions of extremists on both ends of the spectrum, and combining them, I’m hoping we can sort out the implications.”
As if in direct answer to Keats’ stated motivations, William Dembski, a proponent of intelligent design, called the project “scientifically jejune and theologically incompetent.” Dembski, a Baylor University professor of science, religion and philosophy, also noted that if the God element were removed, the project would be “strictly conventional biological research.”
Other observers, however, may be picking up on Keats’ decidedly dadaist undertone. “It’s hard to tell from this whether Mr. Keats is just having some fun or is seriously deranged,” said Michael Behe, Lehigh University biology professor and renowned anti-Darwinist author. “I wish him well and look forward to hearing of his results.”